Show/hide messages
[Click here to share files] [Click here to access AnonSeed private discussion.]
1. If a thread is locked and images are removed, reposting the media will result in a ban.
Did Cracky stop using imageboards before she turned 23?
For reference, she turned 23 on October 12, 2012.
Was her last day on 4chan October 11th 2012?
shoe kinda cute though ngl
>>6523 did you go out of your way to rotate that or was it already like that
What an odd thing to ask. Why does it matter? Do you believe it takes more than 1 second to rotate an image? What makes you think it even needed to be rotated? Are you not aware of phones having orientation sensors? Your thought process has bewildered me.
>>6527 i have the original image
How do you know which is truly "the original"?
>>6529 it's the one i have
So you saw a thing before you saw another thing. So you assume the thing you saw first must have existed longer than the thing you saw second, merely because you saw it first? Are you familiar with the concept of object permanence, that things can exist long before you see them? There's a whole universe that exists outside of your perceptions. In fact the universe existed before you were born and will exist after you die. Meditate on that. It's a powerful thought.
>So you assume the thing you saw first must have existed longer than the thing you saw second, merely because you saw it first?
yes.
Let's put this philosophy to the test.
Here are two images.
I'm sure you've seen at least one of them before, maybe both.
Which of these images did you SEE first?
Which of these images do you think is OLDER?
>>6533I saw image on the right first. I think image on right is older.
You're actually correct. The image on the right is from 2004 and the image on the left is from 2023.
i saw the image on the left first, in 2023. the image on the left is older.
>>6533she looked so cute and sweet how did she end up such a devil child?
I can't live with the guilt anymore. I have to confess. I did rotate the image. I always rotate all images that are not correctly oriented. It takes less than a second per image and it's the right thing to do. Lossless rotation has been a thing for years. IT'S THE RIGHT THING TO DO.
>>6543 yes, but it's not the original. i'm sure you're fucking with dupe checking that way as well.some retard converted many of them to webp... or maybe they were originally webp. we'll never know because fuck heads do shit to the files and even files that seem identical have some modification leaving you wondering if you're deleting the one that's higher quality.
there seem to be 48 in total.
I dunno I just can't jerk off if the picture's sideways
